Workforce Reprofiling in Acute and Mental Health Environments

Workforce is probably the single biggest expenditure of any healthcare organisation, and especially so in NHS (after all, all care is delivered by humans - it works better that way).
Because of this, when efficiencies need to be made, workforce expenditure comes under the spotlight.
Techniques such as Lean, and programmes such as NHS Institute's Productive Series look at ways to shave pennies off each activity. But what about activities that aren't actually necessary, but that organisations hold on to because the individuals fear for their continued employment?
We already know that under Payment by Results, a secondary provider (hospital) can increase their income by increasing their throughput (eg improving quality to the point where length of stay is reduced, which frees up beds, which allows more people to come in for operations). But is this value for money? Does the extra income generated cover the additional cost of driving up quality?
Research
We looked at this with the boards and front-line (clinical and support) staff of an acute teaching hospital, and a care trust. We generated profiles of the staffing currently in place, and the staffing models that the staff themselves thought would deliver best care. We examined cost per unit of activity and quality outcomes, and compared this with the avowed aims of the Trust.
Most importantly, we compared the profiles for similar departments and functions, which generated passionate discussion and soul-searching.
Delivery
The staff themselves agreed potential new staffing profiles, taking into account resources (cash) available and the tariff under payment by results.
Managers, workforce planners and clinicians used the profiles generated to plan and implement projects to deliver the changes and realise the benefits.
Conclusions
In a busy and turbulent world, it's almost impossible for the Directors to mandate every change and every conclusion, and it leads to resentment and de-motivation. The above process engages people, helps them to feel part of the organisation in which they work, to see the bigger picture, to work for the greater good. That's when quality improves at the same time as unit costs reducing.

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

A moral dimension to consulting

Moral dilemmaIt's easy to assume that all of our decisions are purely rational, but they rarely if ever are rational.  And they always have consequences for others, usually consequences that we think we could not have predicted.

But consultants are not here to make decisions, only to provide information and advice.  Does this somehow absolve us from a moral responsibility?

 

The Ten Commandments in Professional Services (6-10)

Interpreting God's Commandments

I've written previously about applying the first five commandments to Professional Services.  Here I show how Do Not Murder, Do Not Steal and so on are just as relevant commandments in the nuance and subtlety of modern life as they ever were.

Read on - and there's an invitation to comment!

The 10 Commandments in Professional Services (1-5)

Keywords:

Two greatest commandsThe Ten Commandments apply just as firmly in each aspect of our daily life as they apply to the whole of our lives.  I'm a management consultant, and on this page I explain how the first five of the Ten Commandments apply to management consulting and professional services.

Getting GPs involved in Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG)

Life in the YearsMost healthcare providers, in UK the same as everywhere else, get paid for each activity they do.  If someone needs care, they get paid.  If someone is well, they don’t.  So there isn’t much incentive (for the healthcare provider) to keep people well, even though it is much better for the person, much better for the nation, and much lower cost.  Minney.org Ltd is working with one CCG to generate enthusiasm and involvement, and the results are fairly successful….

Clinical Commissioning Groups and the NHS

Commissioning Innovation

As we race forwards into clinical commissioning, there are lessons to be learnt from other people.  The latest book “The Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care” by Christensen, Grossman and Hwang points to some things we need to take account of. It makes good reading . . .