Workforce Reprofiling in Acute and Mental Health Environments

Workforce is probably the single biggest expenditure of any healthcare organisation, and especially so in NHS (after all, all care is delivered by humans - it works better that way).
Because of this, when efficiencies need to be made, workforce expenditure comes under the spotlight.
Techniques such as Lean, and programmes such as NHS Institute's Productive Series look at ways to shave pennies off each activity. But what about activities that aren't actually necessary, but that organisations hold on to because the individuals fear for their continued employment?
We already know that under Payment by Results, a secondary provider (hospital) can increase their income by increasing their throughput (eg improving quality to the point where length of stay is reduced, which frees up beds, which allows more people to come in for operations). But is this value for money? Does the extra income generated cover the additional cost of driving up quality?
Research
We looked at this with the boards and front-line (clinical and support) staff of an acute teaching hospital, and a care trust. We generated profiles of the staffing currently in place, and the staffing models that the staff themselves thought would deliver best care. We examined cost per unit of activity and quality outcomes, and compared this with the avowed aims of the Trust.
Most importantly, we compared the profiles for similar departments and functions, which generated passionate discussion and soul-searching.
Delivery
The staff themselves agreed potential new staffing profiles, taking into account resources (cash) available and the tariff under payment by results.
Managers, workforce planners and clinicians used the profiles generated to plan and implement projects to deliver the changes and realise the benefits.
Conclusions
In a busy and turbulent world, it's almost impossible for the Directors to mandate every change and every conclusion, and it leads to resentment and de-motivation. The above process engages people, helps them to feel part of the organisation in which they work, to see the bigger picture, to work for the greater good. That's when quality improves at the same time as unit costs reducing.

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

Judicial System - If I were running the country

Scales of JusticeHow do we make the courts run more smoothly?  Cases take too long and are too expensive, mired in endless argument and counter-argument that are the hallmarks of our adversarial system.  What if we were to set time limits?  Would that work?

Well, let's try it.  Each side presents their best evidence, and if magistrate or jury isn't convinced, they can ask for more time from each side.  If it works for Cricket, that most venerable of British institutions, it should work for courts.  Who knows, they may even become spectator sports?

If I were running the country - encouraging business

Minimum wage

Fantasy government - what would I do if I were in government?  Well how about reduce corporation tax, increase income tax, increase minimum wage and invest in job creation in the regions?  That would be a good start - create jobs where there are workers, then make sure that the right amount of tax is collected and at the same time reduce spend on benefits which are only used to increase profits of selfish organisations.

Would it work?  Have your say.

PwC Report on the Current State of Project Management

PwC Project Management ReportPwC found that successful companies are getting more mature in their project management ability.  This raises the game – successful companies have lower costs from fewer failed projects, and less successful companies have to work harder to catch up.  There are some important lessons to take this report for everyone – Read more…

Joy instead of tedium

The Office

Every office has them - the tasks that have to be done that nobody likes doing.  Whether it's the audit, the wages, standard letters, whatever it is - someone has to do it and it feels like a waste of time and money.

Why should you care?

So you employ somebody, so why do you care about how tedious the task is? Well they are costing money, to do something that could be done far more effectively.

Learning from the Past

Evidence for service improvement

Many public service changes have little basis in evidence. Their success (or otherwise) does not appear to depend on how 'good' the policy itself is, but rather on how it has been implemented. This relies on staff attitudes and relationships. My research falls into a number of broad categories: finding out what is currently happening; what people think about it; and what people think it will mean.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: