Social Return on Investment (SROI) and demonstrating Value for Money

Counting the Value  in different currencies (abacus) I’ve just returned from my SROI Practitioner training. What is this new tool? It depends on who you ask:

 

Who cares?

HM Treasury believes it is broadly the same as Cost Benefits Analysis, which is a part of the Benefits Realisation Plans that I do regularly
Some Government departments and Arms-Length Bodies believe it is far richer, since as well as assigning a monetary value to each outcome (such as increased self-esteem) and demonstrating the Return on Investment, it also includes a narrative explaining what this means in ways that people can relate to.

 

How is SROI different?

We were told on the training that an SROI has six principles, of which three distinguish it from other analysis:
  • Stakeholder engagement – all stakeholders who are materially affected need to be involved: that is, their input, their review of the report before it is final, their engagement with the analysis and assignment of values (not just a postcard informing them of a listening session)
  • Materiality – recognise any other contributions from other projects, initiatives and services; recognise what is NOT a result of my service even though it is a change; avoid double-counting benefits
  • Assigning monetary value – this provides a lowest common denominator which allows me to present an SROI ratio – how much you get back per £1 (or $1 or €1 invested). Obviously lots of assumptions have to be used, but these are transparent (and checked with stakeholders) and can be discussed

 

A standard, credible approach

Because it is a Standard Approach many funding organisations (charities and philanthropists as well as government) expect a proper report and will favour care and improvement providers who submit one as part of their request for funding.
In other words, as time goes on, organisations seeking funding will either present their benefits reports prepared using SROI principles, or they will find their requests get a lower priority in the eyes of funders. Funding bodies can make sure nothing important is missed, and their assessments using these principles are easily defensible.

 

Take Action

Check out what it consists of at http://www.sroi-uk.org/, and why it matters to you. It is most relevant to statutory services (eg commissioners and providers of health and social care that are funded by government) but it’s likely to be relevant to health and social care service providers and those funding these too. And when a commercial organisation wants to emphasise its Green credentials, what better way than to use a standard and endorsed approach?
I’m not accredited yet – I’ve only been on the training. I now need to demonstrate that I can apply it and I expect this will take up to 6 months. In the meantime, I’m using the support of the SROI network to ensure my reports are top quality.

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

A moral dimension to consulting

Moral dilemmaIt's easy to assume that all of our decisions are purely rational, but they rarely if ever are rational.  And they always have consequences for others, usually consequences that we think we could not have predicted.

But consultants are not here to make decisions, only to provide information and advice.  Does this somehow absolve us from a moral responsibility?

 

The Ten Commandments in Professional Services (6-10)

Interpreting God's Commandments

I've written previously about applying the first five commandments to Professional Services.  Here I show how Do Not Murder, Do Not Steal and so on are just as relevant commandments in the nuance and subtlety of modern life as they ever were.

Read on - and there's an invitation to comment!

The 10 Commandments in Professional Services (1-5)

Keywords:

Two greatest commandsThe Ten Commandments apply just as firmly in each aspect of our daily life as they apply to the whole of our lives.  I'm a management consultant, and on this page I explain how the first five of the Ten Commandments apply to management consulting and professional services.

Getting GPs involved in Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG)

Life in the YearsMost healthcare providers, in UK the same as everywhere else, get paid for each activity they do.  If someone needs care, they get paid.  If someone is well, they don’t.  So there isn’t much incentive (for the healthcare provider) to keep people well, even though it is much better for the person, much better for the nation, and much lower cost.  Minney.org Ltd is working with one CCG to generate enthusiasm and involvement, and the results are fairly successful….

Clinical Commissioning Groups and the NHS

Commissioning Innovation

As we race forwards into clinical commissioning, there are lessons to be learnt from other people.  The latest book “The Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care” by Christensen, Grossman and Hwang points to some things we need to take account of. It makes good reading . . .