Primary Care and GP Engagement

Nuffield Trust prepared reportThe NHS budget is protected from cuts under the new government. But the rise in Emergency Admissions over the last few years threatens to use up all of the protection and more. And yet, until we invest in care outside of hospital, we can’t change this rise.
I have to declare an interest – well two actually.

I am business development manager for a GP surgery in North East England, and establishing a consortium of GPs to provide services outside hospital
I spend part of the week working at NHS Information Centre, where I have access to data on health care use (through the publicly available services of NHS Comparators

Government health policy for increasingly local decisions
This coalition government has made no secret of putting decision-making into the hands of GPs (General medical Practitioners), and this is a good thing. But it may not happen overnight (“David Nicholson doubts 2012 timescale for GP commissioning role”
 
GPs can help
GPs are generally the decision-makers.
GPs decide what care each individual patient should receive, what pathway they should follow.
They either create, or don’t create, alternative pathways for patients in the community which gives patients an opportunity to avoid hospital and stay in the community in their support network.
They either make it easy for patients to go to their own doctor, or they don’t; patients always choose the path of least resistance (cost to NHS of patient seeing GP around £18, cost just for attending hospital around £70, cost of treatment on top of this).
Out-of-Hours services (OOH) are a supreme case in point. In 2004, GPs relinquished responsibility for providing OOH services, because the Blair government believed that it could provide a better service, for less money, through private contracts. The result – patients turning up at A&E in their droves, and ultimately poor treatment and deaths (Penny Campbell 2006, David Gray 2009, Kirklees Report 2009).
We already have the tools to do something about this
UK’s Department of Health (DH) has established a formula for funding patient care, on the basis of GPs taking responsibility
Doctors already have formal networks between a locality’s GPs and hospital consultants, whether through learning networks or old training ties.
Doctors and other health professionals already meet, again formally and informally, to improve patient care; the networks are already established here. Health professionals together, working with social care professionals, are capable and usually willing to design new care pathways for patients, as long as it is worth while – the decisions are accepted by the Primary Care Trust (PCT).
 
What’s in it for PCTs?
World Class Commissioning assessment (WCC) has been the benchmark for a quality PCT for some years. A substantial part of the score is how well PCTs engage with healthcare professionals.
When WCC is replaced, it’s extremely likely to be with something broadly similar – if not measuring engagement, then at least measuring budgetary performance; this is dependent on GP engagement too.
 
So how do you engage with your local GPs?
Why would GPs, freed of their responsibility for everything for the last 6 years, want to take it all back again?
I’ve found that it takes a combination of specialist analysis and presentation skills, and specialist engagement skills, with a dose of credibility, to close the loop on GP engagement.
A lot of it is about presentation – what you present, how you prepare the data for presentation, and of course what you don’t present.
 
I believe we can help you there. 
See also article on Technorati

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

A moral dimension to consulting

Moral dilemmaIt's easy to assume that all of our decisions are purely rational, but they rarely if ever are rational.  And they always have consequences for others, usually consequences that we think we could not have predicted.

But consultants are not here to make decisions, only to provide information and advice.  Does this somehow absolve us from a moral responsibility?

 

The Ten Commandments in Professional Services (6-10)

Interpreting God's Commandments

I've written previously about applying the first five commandments to Professional Services.  Here I show how Do Not Murder, Do Not Steal and so on are just as relevant commandments in the nuance and subtlety of modern life as they ever were.

Read on - and there's an invitation to comment!

The 10 Commandments in Professional Services (1-5)

Keywords:

Two greatest commandsThe Ten Commandments apply just as firmly in each aspect of our daily life as they apply to the whole of our lives.  I'm a management consultant, and on this page I explain how the first five of the Ten Commandments apply to management consulting and professional services.

Getting GPs involved in Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG)

Life in the YearsMost healthcare providers, in UK the same as everywhere else, get paid for each activity they do.  If someone needs care, they get paid.  If someone is well, they don’t.  So there isn’t much incentive (for the healthcare provider) to keep people well, even though it is much better for the person, much better for the nation, and much lower cost.  Minney.org Ltd is working with one CCG to generate enthusiasm and involvement, and the results are fairly successful….

Clinical Commissioning Groups and the NHS

Commissioning Innovation

As we race forwards into clinical commissioning, there are lessons to be learnt from other people.  The latest book “The Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care” by Christensen, Grossman and Hwang points to some things we need to take account of. It makes good reading . . .