Benefits Management and Benefits Realisation

Benefits Management and Benefits Realisation are priorities for public sector – too much money has been spent, for too long, with no evidence that the taxpayer (or anyone else) is getting value for money.
We might be – but with no way to find out, we get suspicious.

Benefits management strategy

Benefits Approach

Benefits Tracking Process

Why write a BMS?
Writing about how you will approach Benefits, and what your strategy is, may seem like an unnecessary distraction from getting on with the actual Benefits Realisation.
Don’t climb the wrong ladder
But as Stephen Covey described [i] , don’t get to the top, look out, and say “whoops, climbed over the wrong wall”.
We don’t want to measure for the sake of measuring, but so that we can adjust our course to reach the right destination.
We don’t even want to measure any old benefit, we want to prioritise the most important benefits, the

solutions to pressing problems
achievements that really make a difference

Writing a strategy
Writing a strategy helps you to think about:

WHY you are making this investment in change, what you are trying to achieve

HOW you will demonstrate that you are on track, or discover that you aren’t, and change course
WHAT you will measure in order to find this
WHEN you need to start – do you need to prepare well in advance, and when do you expect to see results?
WHERE  will responsibility for benefits realisation, and for benefits measurement, reside, and how will they link together
WHO [ii] takes responsibility

Before you get too excited
It’s tempting to write an all-encompassing Benefits Management Strategy, including Strategy (what it aligns with), Approach (how you will plan), and Tracking Process (how you will measure).
But these are each important at different points in the project.
Benefits_Cycle_(simple).png
The Benefits Management Strategy
 is needed during the diagnosis stage (typically equivalent to Project Initiation).  It documents how the project aligns to the strategic objectives of the organisation or local health and care economy, scope, and the benefits realisation processes to be used.
MSP [iii] is focussed on Benefits Realisation, and the format of the Benefits Management Strategy described here is MSP compliant, if a little more practical and applicable.
The Benefits Approach
Addresses the specifics of how you will define benefits (whether for a single organisation or across different organisations), prioritise them, plan the dependencies which show what needs to be done to realise these benefits, and document everything.
The Benefits Approach evolves throughout the planning stage of the project.  It makes sense to keep it as a separate document so you aren’t tempted to keep re-writing the Benefits Management Strategy and your reviewers don’t need to keep reviewing it.
The Benefits Tracking Process
Just as the Benefits Approach evolves during the planning stage, so Benefits Tracking will evolve during service delivery.  Of course you need to define up front what you intend to monitor, and prepare a baseline.  At the same time you must be open to change.  We look at Benefits Tracking here

[i] Stephen Covey, 7 habits of highly effective people.  Stephen actually wrote in “Putting First Things First “'It's incredibly easy to get caught up in an activity trap, in the busy-ness of life, to work harder and harder at climbing the ladder of success, only to discover it's leaning against the wrong wall'

[ii] Rudyard Kipling “the elephant’s child” I keep six honest serving men, they taught me all I knew, their names are What and Why and When, and Where and How and Who

[iii] OGC Managing Successful Programmes

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

The 10 Commandments in Professional Services (1-5)

Keywords:

Two greatest commandsThe Ten Commandments apply just as firmly in each aspect of our daily life as they apply to the whole of our lives.  I'm a management consultant, and on this page I explain how the first five of the Ten Commandments apply to management consulting and professional services.

Getting GPs involved in Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG)

Life in the YearsMost healthcare providers, in UK the same as everywhere else, get paid for each activity they do.  If someone needs care, they get paid.  If someone is well, they don’t.  So there isn’t much incentive (for the healthcare provider) to keep people well, even though it is much better for the person, much better for the nation, and much lower cost.  Minney.org Ltd is working with one CCG to generate enthusiasm and involvement, and the results are fairly successful….

Clinical Commissioning Groups and the NHS

Commissioning Innovation

As we race forwards into clinical commissioning, there are lessons to be learnt from other people.  The latest book “The Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care” by Christensen, Grossman and Hwang points to some things we need to take account of. It makes good reading . . .

Getting GPs involved in GP Commissioning

Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG)GPs know the most about the patients registered with them, and have the biggest incentives to innovate and to commission better services. So why aren't they embracing Clinical Commissioning and using it to improve healthcare right across the country?

It could be any of a number of reasons, and we believe it's about understanding.  What's more, with our experience of doing exactly this (supporting GPs to get engaged), we can demonstrate how we've made a difference, and how it could work for other CCGs.

The Politics of CCGs

Clinical Commissioning

Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG), the organisations that will commission  healthcare for nearly 60million people across England at a value of around £70billion, are beginning to take shape.

They come in essentially three types, and if you want to supply healthcare to these CCGs, even if you are an established provider of healthcare, you need to understand what you are dealing with